JPEG XL

Info

rules 58
github 38692
reddit 688

JPEG XL

jxl-rs 0
tools 4270
website 1813
adoption 22069
image-compression-forum 0
glitch-art 1071

General chat

welcome 3957
introduce-yourself 294
color 1687
photography 3532
other-codecs 25116
on-topic 26652
off-topic 23987

Voice Channels

General 2578

Archived

bot-spam 4577

Lossy quality

Scope
2021-10-05 05:31:49
1. Current JXL 2. <https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/689>
2021-10-05 05:32:13
2021-10-05 05:32:13
2021-10-05 05:32:15
2021-10-05 05:32:16
2021-10-05 05:32:18
2021-10-05 05:32:19
2021-10-05 05:32:21
2021-10-05 05:32:22
2021-10-05 05:32:25
2021-10-05 05:32:25
2021-10-05 05:32:28
2021-10-05 05:32:28
2021-10-05 05:32:31
2021-10-05 05:32:32
2021-10-05 05:32:35
2021-10-05 05:32:35
2021-10-05 05:32:44
2021-10-05 05:32:45
2021-10-05 05:32:49
2021-10-05 05:32:50
2021-10-05 05:32:53
2021-10-05 05:32:54
2021-10-05 05:32:57
2021-10-05 05:32:57
2021-10-05 05:33:00
2021-10-05 05:33:01
2021-10-05 05:33:03
2021-10-05 05:33:04
2021-10-05 05:33:07
2021-10-05 05:33:08
2021-10-05 05:33:10
2021-10-05 05:33:12
2021-10-05 06:06:10
2021-10-05 06:06:15
2021-10-05 06:06:49
Same size comparison And yes, #689 is better, the images are smoother, but there are less noticeable artifacts and are overall more pleasing to the eye Though, still needs improvements on eliminating the ringing artifacts (because they remain the most noticeable and annoying)
Scope 1. Current JXL 2. <https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/689>
2021-10-06 12:56:46
<https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/691>
2021-10-06 12:56:59
2021-10-06 12:57:00
2021-10-06 12:57:00
2021-10-06 12:57:01
2021-10-06 12:57:02
2021-10-06 12:57:02
2021-10-06 12:57:05
2021-10-06 12:57:06
2021-10-06 12:57:06
2021-10-06 12:57:09
2021-10-06 12:57:09
2021-10-06 12:57:10
2021-10-06 12:57:12
2021-10-06 12:57:13
2021-10-06 12:57:14
2021-10-06 12:57:15
2021-10-06 12:57:16
fab
2021-10-06 01:04:21
thanks